| Home | Old Testament Studies | Hosea Table of Contents | Previous Section | Next Section |
INTRODUCTION TO HOSEA
| MT | LXX |
| Hosea | Hosea |
| Joel | Amos |
| Amos | Micah |
| Obadiah | Joel |
| Jonah | Obadiah |
| Micah | Jonah |
"It is that profound pathos, let loose towards Israel in speech after speech, irony after irony, metaphor after metaphor, question after question, which gives the book its fire" (p. 20).
For me, #3 fits all the known information best.
There are several scholarly suggestions (the differences are caused by Pekah's 30 year reign, cf. 2 Kgs. 15:27. For a good brief answer see Gleason Archer, Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, pp. 209-211):
The text of Hosea is the most disputed in the OT (see NET Bible, p. 1557, #1). I am certainly not a Hebrew scholar, but I do bring other strengths (insights) into the interpretive process.
The state of the Hebrew text is partly due to the emotion of Hosea's writing and partly to its poetic form (genre). His metaphors are fresh and varied. This has caused problems for readers/scribes, both ancient and modern. The poetic nature, though difficult lexically, makes the natural parallelism a means of understanding lines of poetry even if the original text or lexical forms are lost. No major truth is irreparably lost because of the parallelism and the recurrent pattern of truths.
Textual emendation is helpful (and necessary), but must always remain speculative. Here is where the variety of ancient versions is helpful in seeing how other ancient interpreters have seen these disputed lines of poetry.
SPECIAL TOPIC: TEXTUAL CRITICISM
| Home | Old Testament Studies | Hosea Table of Contents | Previous Section | Next Section |
Copyright © 2014 Bible Lessons International